umd_tree_cover_gain
created_on
2024-07-11T15:09:23.802886
updated_on
2024-10-04T16:27:40.723053
resolution_description
30 × 30 meters
geographic_coverage
Global land area (excluding Antarctica and other Arctic islands)
update_frequency
Every three years
citation
Use the following credit when these data are displayed:
Source: Hansen/UMD/Google/USGS/NASA, accessed through Global Forest Watch
Use the following credit when these data are cited:
Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” *Science* 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available on-line from:http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest. Accessed through Global Forest Watch on [date]. www.globalforestwatch.org
source
Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. 2013. “High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change.” *Science* 342 (15 November): 850–53. Data available from: [earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest](http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest).
license
[CC BY 4.0](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
overview
This data set, a collaboration between the [GLAD](http://glad.geog.umd.edu/) (Global Land Analysis & Discovery) lab at the University of Maryland, Google, USGS, and NASA, measures areas of tree cover gain across all global land (except Antarctica and other Arctic islands) at 30 × 30 meter resolution, displayed as a 12-year cumulative layer. The data were generated using multispectral satellite imagery from the [Landsat 7](http://landsat.usgs.gov/) thematic mapper plus (ETM+) sensor. Over 600,000 Landsat 7 images were compiled and analyzed using Google Earth Engine, a cloud platform for earth observation and data analysis. The clear land surface observations (30 × 30 meter pixels) in the satellite images were assembled and a supervised learning algorithm was then applied to identify per pixel tree cover gain.<br><br>Tree cover gain was defined as the establishment of tree canopy at the Landsat pixel scale in an area that previously had no tree cover. Tree cover gain may indicate a number of potential activities, including natural forest growth or the crop rotation cycle of tree plantations.<br><br>When zoomed out (< zoom level 13), pixels of gain are shaded according to the density of gain at the 30 x 30 meter scale. Pixels with darker shading represent areas with a higher concentration of tree cover gain, whereas pixels with lighter shading indicate a lower concentration of tree cover gain. There is no variation in pixel shading when the data is at full resolution (≥ zoom level 13).<br><br>The tree cover canopy density of the displayed data is >50%.<br>
function
Identifies areas of tree cover gain
cautions
In this data set, “tree cover” is defined as all vegetation greater than 5 meters in height, and may take the form of natural forests or plantations across a range of canopy densities. “Gain” is defined as the establishment of tree canopy at the Landsat pixel scale in an area that previously had no tree cover. Tree cover gain may indicate a number of potential activities, including natural forest growth or the crop rotation cycle of tree plantations. <br><br>Due to variation in research methodology and date of content, tree cover, loss, and gain data sets cannot be compared accurately against each other. Accordingly, “net” loss cannot be calculated by subtracting figures for tree cover gain from tree cover loss, and current (post-2000) tree cover cannot be determined by subtracting figures for annual tree cover loss from year 2000 tree cover. <br><br>The authors evaluated the overall prevalence of false positives (commission errors) in this data at 24%, and the prevalence of false negatives (omission errors) at 26%, though the accuracy varies by biome and thus may be higher or lower in any particular location. Read our [blog series](http://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data/how-accurate-is-accurate-enough-examining-the-glad-global-tree-cover-change-data-part-1.html) on the accuracy of this data for more information.<br>
key_restrictions
CC BY 4.0
why_added
Best available global data of tree cover gain
learn_more
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6160/850
id
d797dc72-1353-4a46-9467-fd226b8d3d88